Every human being living on earth has the right to be respectable. Every human being on Earth has the right to live AS they please. They do not have the right to HURT someone because of their way of life, but they have a right to live without being hurt or bothered by any other human being. Free will is what human beings are given and for it they will be judged.
This is one reason I have never ever interfered with the choices people around me have made. No matter how much it hurt me, I let them be. Just because I never wanted to be blamed for interfering with someone’s free will. But, I HAVE interfered with them when someone else got hurt or affected by their choice.
That is my point here: Is it Rights violation to HALT the process of Choice by GIVING only one choice? Or is it stopping a person from hurting someone because of a choice they made?
Lets say a friend of mine loves to drink. I know it is wrong, and so does he. But, I don’t interfere with him because I want him to be able to exercise his right to do as he pleases. I advise him, give him the pros an cons but I do not interfere with his drinking because it is not my right to interfere. Now, if this same friend gets drunk and beats up his wife or kids, then I intervene – still not scrutinizing him for the drinking but actively countering the affect of drinking.
Yes, the state and law can punish him all they like if they catch him and if it is illegal.
Is that right or is that wrong? My approach?
Please do note that I am condemning his act , not encouraging it..but, I am not stopping him outright unless he proceeds to do something to hurt someone.. because that then is not my right.
I see a lot of people exercising a right they don’t really have. And, that is interfering with someone without JUST cause. How and when do we decide that we can interfere?